I've always accepted alphabetical order as the "scien
tific" way of doing things, but I really don't know why. I rarely arrange things alphabetically for my own use. When I sort, I do so according to importance, frequency of use, etc.. What I like so much about my own exclusive corners of the internet, is that I can arrange them in ways that make sense to me. When I open my browser, my homepage is iGoogle. It looks like this:


Arranging items to suit my needs/habits is easy enough, all I have to do is drag them around. I find myself changing things up frequently, depending on my current needs. Google reader is almost always located at the top right, because it's what I check most frequently. The window for Gmail is closed because I forward emails to my Mac Mail, and read them there. I still keep the Gmail window, though, because sometimes Mac Mail doesn't work and I like my account to be easily accessible. Weather, a calendar, and news headlines are prominently positioned, as well, while the distracting stuff (like Youtube, iTunes, and the NY Times crossword) are labeled as "less important," by me, but still visible.
Hi Bethany, Here are a few points I connected with in your response:
ReplyDelete--the uninterrogated "default" nature of alphabetical order
I think Weinberger drove this point home when he pointed out that if we sorted kids by race or parental income it would be disaster, whereas alphabetical order if just fine because it is arbitrary. I too had never really considered the alphabet arbitrary.
--"my own, exclusive corners of the internet"
a lovely turn of phrase, which I think captures the participatory spirit of Web 2.0
To say that there are corners of the internet makes me think of the internet as a physical space...Weinberger wants to say how the digital is replacing/displacing the physical (see page 71). This is a point of tension I would like to address further in class. How do we--mortal beings, subject to the laws of physics--imagine the digital world?
--I like how you have embedded screenshots in your response; it is a direct response to the parameters of the assignment.